朝5晚9
A+操作，骑士送走施罗德，只是个开始？_我的网站
一 | 骑士，又有动作了。
二 |
来自名记Shams的报道，骑士与黄蜂达成了一笔极限1换1交易：——骑士送出施罗德和部分现金——黄蜂送出特雷曼
先说下，施罗德被交易真不意外。
Editor's Note:
Chinese President Xi Jinping has pointed out, "to understand China today, one must learn to understand the Communist Party of China (CPC)." With the rapid development of China's economy and society, and the steady advancement of the Chinese path to modernization, the notable achievements of the CPC have drawn extensive international attention and scholarly interest. Against this backdrop, the Global Times has launched the "CPC in Global Eyes" column, focusing on the feelings, perspectives and insights of international friends from various fields regarding the CPC's historical path and achievements.
They include those who have toured China, who deeply study the CPC in academic fields, who work, live, study, seek employment or do business in various fields in China, and who pay close attention to the CPC's policies and trends, although they haven't visited the country in person. Through their vivid personal experiences, we aim to present a multifaceted overseas view of the CPC.
In the 16th installment of this series, we followed two Latin American scholars as they toured Chinese cities, witnessing how the CPC's people-centered, long-term development vision is translated into tangible everyday improvements - and reflecting on what China's experience might offer for state capacity building in Latin America.
Standing before the glass at the Shanghai Urban Planning Exhibition Center, Ecuadorian scholar María Imelda Robalino gently traced the edge of the giant city model with her fingertips, her eyes reflecting the orderly contours of this megacity stretching toward the horizon. The clear lines linking green spaces along the city's iconic Huangpu River, dense residential neighborhoods and industrial parks drew the public administration scholar, who has long studied urban expansion in Latin America, into deep thought.
Beside her, Mariana Escalante, a Mexican scholar in China studies, gazed at the scrolling timeline of Shanghai's long-term urban plans on a screen and expressed her admiration for the CPC and the Chinese government's all-out efforts in development and construction. "It's very impressive that they're taking care of all the factors that influence Chinese people, not just development and the economy, but also the environment and the well-being of the people," she told the Global Times at the exhibition center.
In June, a delegation of more than 20 think tank scholars from about 15 Latin American countries, including Argentina, Brazil, Mexico and Ecuador, started their tour in China. Over the course of more than 10 days, they visited cities including Beijing, Shanghai and Nanjing, and went into urban planning exhibition centers, residential communities, Party schools, eco-friendly power plants and university think tanks. Robalino and Escalante were among them. Like many others in the group, they came with a shared purpose: to see for themselves what Chinese modernization under CPC leadership actually looks like.
"I always emphasize the importance of seeing and experiencing China with my own eyes, in addition to learning about it through documents, academic research or news reports," Escalante told the Global Times.
From plans to everyday life
For Escalante, this trip to China was far from her first encounter with the country.
A professor at the National Autonomous University of Mexico and founder of Mexican Association of Sinology, she has visited China many times before - yet each journey still brings fresh discoveries. "China is a country that changes at an impressive speed, so I try to visit as often as possible," she told the Global Times. "Every trip allows me to observe new processes, and compare what I study in texts with how policies are implemented."
Robalino approached her China visit with a broader set of expectations. Her institution, Ecuador's National Institute of Advanced Studies, has a Center for Chinese Studies, and this trip was meant to deepen existing academic ties. As a scholar of public policy and innovation, she also hoped to observe firsthand how China builds state capacity.
With different expectations, the delegation set off on a "dialogue" spanning mountains and seas. In Shanghai, the Latin American scholars visited the city's urban planning exhibition center and also stepped into one of its most local residential communities. If the former showed them how a metropolis is "planned" into being, the field visit to Block 228 Changbai New Village Subdistrict, or Changbai 228, revealed how planning is translated into everyday life - through the leadership and support of CPC organizations at every level.
On an afternoon in early June, the delegation stepped into Changbai 228 in Shanghai's Yangpu district. Since its completion in 1952, it has served as a warm home for the city's industrial workers. More than seven decades later, through urban planning, it has been transformed into a mixed-use community that preserves historical memory while offering modern services.
As the delegation walked through the neighborhood, they passed one amenity after another: a convenience commercial center, an affordable sports and health center, a restaurant, and subsidized rental housing. Inside a local Party-mass service center, some residents were dancing, while music drifted out into the hall. At the entrance, several scholars paused and, unable to resist, began clapping along to the beat.
"From the Shanghai Urban Planning Exhibition Center, I was able to observe how the state plans and envisions the development of the city; at Changbai 228, I was able to observe the results of that action from the perspective of the community and everyday life," Robalino told the Global Times. What intrigued her most was "how a planned intervention can become a space that does not feel rigid or imposed, but instead becomes a place for connection and coexistence." To her, the case revealed one of the less visible dimensions of public action: what happens after planning, during implementation, when public decisions become part of people's daily lives.
Escalante was equally struck by what Changbai 228 revealed about the CPC's people-centered philosophy. "What attracted my attention most at 228 was the close connection between urban renewal and the everyday well-being of residents," she said.
"Urban space should not be organized solely around commercial consumption. Changbai 228 includes commercial services, but it also has public and community spaces where people can meet, rest or take part in activities, without consumption necessarily being at the center of the experience." In Escalante's view, the CPC's people-centered approach had taken on tangible form. "Development should not be understood only in economic terms or in terms of economic gain, but also in terms of the people."
An immersive understanding
Having visited China in person and seen firsthand how CPC policies are implemented in everyday life and put at the service of the people, these Latin American scholars with a strong interest in China gained a more immersive understanding of some of the Party's core concepts.
Several of the projects the scholars visited enabled them to observe how these concepts are translated into concrete policies and projects, Escalante said. She pointed to some terms often mentioned by the CPC and the Chinese government, such as "people-centered development," "common prosperity" and "Chinese modernization."
"People-centered development" means that development should not be measured solely by economic growth, infrastructure construction or technological progress, but also by its ability to improve people's livelihoods and quality of life, she added.
The scholar further pointed out that, "common prosperity" adds another layer to this vision: growth and modernization should benefit a broader swath of society, and development should help reduce social and regional inequalities. "What is the point of achieving high levels of economic growth or technological development if a significant part of the population is left outside its benefits?"
As for "Chinese modernization," Escalante described it as a modernization path suited to China's own historical, social and political conditions, rather than the assumption that there is only one universal model to follow.
"The leadership of the CPC is also explicitly presented as one of its central elements. From my perspective, the role of the Party is precisely one of the defining features of this process," she told the Global Times. "The Chinese government has considerable capacity to set long-term development goals, coordinate public policies and mobilize resources toward specific priorities. What interests me is how these broad ideas are translated - or are intended to be translated - into concrete policies, and what results they produce at different levels of society."
Cooperation amid challenges
This year marks the 10th anniversary of the launch of the China-Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC) Forum. Data show that in 2024 trade between China and Latin American and Caribbean countries exceeded $500 billion for the first time, more than 40 times that of the beginning of this century. In 2025, the figure climbed further to $549 billion. More than 20 Latin American countries had joined the Belt and Road cooperation framework, the Xinhua News Agency reported in May 2025.
Behind the numbers are scholars' observations and reflections. Escalante believes that one of the most practical and promising areas for cooperation between China and Latin America lies in sustainable urban transportation and its integration with new energy - including electric public transit, charging infrastructure, energy storage technologies, smart traffic management systems and shared mobility services. "These are particularly relevant areas for large Latin American cities that face problems such as congestion, pollution, unequal access to transportation and long commuting times," she said.
From the perspective of public administration, Robalino pointed to at least two areas where China and Latin America could find concrete opportunities for South-South cooperation.
"One is the exchange of experience on long-term planning, policy monitoring and strengthening implementation capacity; the other is public innovation," she told the Global Times. "It would be particularly interesting to exchange methodologies for experimentation, institutional learning and scaling up innovations."
When asked about the resurgence of "Monroe Doctrine" thinking in the US, Escalante did not evade the issue. "US influence and pressure on Latin America have a long history," she said. What worries her now, she added, is that the US government has once again publicly invoked the Monroe Doctrine, "which inevitably raises questions in Latin America about sovereignty and the capacity to make our own decisions."
At the same time, Escalante argued that it is too simplistic to explain Latin America's limited autonomy solely through external pressure. "Autonomy also depends on our own capacities. A country with strong institutions, a more diversified economy, lower levels of poverty and inequality, greater scientific and technological capabilities, and a long-term development strategy also has more room to decide with whom it wants to build relations and on what terms," she said.
Looking at Latin America, Escalante said one of the most important lessons from China's experience is the country's ability to define long-term goals and, above all, to translate them into concrete policies.
"Our countries have very different political systems, histories and social conditions, so this is not about copying the Chinese model," she told the Global Times. "However, we can reflect on the importance of building institutional systems that can plan, coordinate policies, ensure a certain degree of continuity and make public decisions truly take effect."
As the scholar put it, "China's experience can prompt Latin America to ask an important question: how do we build states with enough capacity to turn development goals into concrete and lasting improvements in people's lives?"
。 围绕在施罗德身上的交易传言已经持续了一整个休赛期，之所以迟迟没有达成，主要是因为他的合同太大，表现已经无法匹配身价。 具体来说，施罗德去年夏天与国王签下一份3年4500万合同，目前这份合同还剩下两年1480万、1551万（保障部分435万），他的表现则是： ——国王期间，40场比赛，26场替补，场均上场26.4分钟，得到12.8分3.1篮板5.3助攻，三项命中率40.8%/34.3%/82.0%，真实命中率53.1% ——骑士期间，30场比赛，27场替补，场均上场21.4分钟，得到8.2分2.3篮板4.3助攻，三项命中率40.1%/29.0%/86.1%，真实命中率51.5% 需要说的是，季后赛施罗德的上场时间还降低到了15.9分钟，且场均只能等到5.5分，投篮命中率38.1%，三分命中率33.3%，真实命中率49.7%。 FIBA的施罗德可能是个巨星，但是在NBA，他可能连首发级别都不算，至少从上赛季来看，施罗德进攻低效、需要持球、防守缺乏天赋的缺点并没有改变。 骑士从节省薪资、腾出空间引援的角度出发，交易施罗德几乎只是时间问题，最终这笔交易让骑士省下了680万美元，在还未续约哈登的情况下，骑士现在距离第一土豪线还有3200万空间、距离第二土豪线还有4400万空间。
三 | 回到这笔交易，既然是送走负资产，而且还没有搭上选秀权，那么得到的筹码也不会太好，特雷曼正是这样的一个球员。特雷曼是2021届的首轮18顺位，雷霆培养了两年多之后送至黄蜂（当时的海沃德交易），2024-25赛季，他曾场均拿到14.4分2.9篮板3.0助攻。
四 | 然而因为腰椎间盘突出，该赛季他一共只打了13场比赛，也是因此，他最终只得到了一份3年2400万续约（最后一年球队选项） 当时看，这笔续约并不差，但从上赛季来看，这份合同也已经出现了溢价，上赛季复出之后的特雷曼角色定位、表现都大幅下滑：53场比赛，52场替补，场均上场12.6分钟，得到5.5分1.7篮板1.6助攻，投篮命中率36.0%，三分命中率32.3%，真实命中率46.2%。
五 | 施罗德虽差，但也比特雷曼强，后者的加盟很难给骑士带来什么实质性帮助，有可能被骑士继续交易，2027年的球队选项大概率也不会执行。 对于黄蜂，甩走特雷曼、得到施罗德让他们继续增强替补阵容，不过在今夏接连送走三球、布里奇斯两位核心之后，黄蜂下赛季大概率难出成绩——施罗德生涯初期效力于老鹰时，曾与现任黄蜂总裁杰夫彼得森及主教练查尔斯李共事，双方颇有渊源，这应该也是黄蜂达成交易的目的之一。 此外，黄蜂阵中可不只一个德国球员，今年的首轮14号秀施泰因巴赫、首轮18号秀小克里斯琴安德森也都是德国球员或者拥有德国国籍。 值得一提的是，在这笔交易达成之后，施罗德将迎来自己生涯效力的第12支球队，距离追平伊斯梅尔史密斯的13队纪录只差1队。 以及，单单是过去两年时间，施罗德就效力了6支不同球队——这两年施罗德给人的感觉就是，他不是正在被交易，就是马上被交易。某种意义上，这也能说明施罗德的能力不足，但从另外一个角度来说，被交易这么多次依然没有淡出NBA，反而能说明他确实有点东西。 只说骑士，个人觉得，这笔交易不会是今夏他们操作的终点，不出意外的话，库明加或者沃特森其中之一要来（感觉很可能是沃特森）。
六 | 骑士可以继续送走斯特鲁斯（年薪1660万）和特雷曼，然后腾出空间给沃特森和哈登，然后再利用底薪签下一个替补得分手（比如德罗赞？），这应该是最佳结果。 如果将这笔施罗德交易视为骑士后续操作的前奏，那么给个A+评价都不过分，当然即便是单看这笔交易，骑士没送走一个选秀权就把施罗德清理了，也是一笔A-以上的交易。 后续骑士会有什么样的操作、沃特森/库明加会不会加盟、施罗德未来能不能追平或者打破伊斯梅尔史密斯的纪录，我们再拭目以待吧。
Current article:http://y0p.lindunfokangliucishirun.shop/list_e9l1iow/kadh.html
Published on:15:10:42